Acts 18:14

Open his mouth. A common formula used to introduce a formal discourse (cf. Matt. 5:2; 13:35; Acts 10:34). Paul was about to undertake a formal defense, but this proved to be unnecessary. Gallio said. Gallio could scarcely have resided in Achaia for any length of time without hearing of the new Christian movement. He doubtless knew of the Jews’ difficulties. Also, he probably knew something of Paul. But from his standpoint — that of a philosopher and a statesman — this was not a matter for his judgment. He did not intend to draw a definite line between religions recognized by Rome, and those that were not. A matter of wrong or wicked lewdness. Rather, “a matter of wrongdoing or wicked villainy.” The two things a magistrate would take into account were (1) any evildoing (cf. ch. 24:20) or act of injustice, or (2) any unscrupulous conduct involving moral wrong. In adjudging such matters he would be carrying out his duty as an administrator of Roman law and equity. Both expressions here used point to acts of open wrong, such as robbery or assault; the second designates those in which a fraudulent cunning or adroitness is the chief characteristic. Reason would. Or, “according to reason,” “as is right.” I should bear with you. That is, I would hear your case out. The verb is also used as a technical term for taking up a complaint. Gallio showed by his language that the Romans considered themselves superior to the tolerated Jews. But if their case warranted, the Jews should enjoy the benefit of such toleration, and he would inquire into any matters that pertained to his office and Roman law.